
|
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Based on its fundamental corporate philosophies, the Company
is working to improve its corporate governance as one of the most important management
issues, with the aim of ensuring that Honda will be a company that our shareholders,
customers and society want to exist.
Honda's organization reflects its fundamental corporate philosophies. Each regional
operation carries out its businesses so as to quickly and efficiently respond
to customer needs, while each business operation makes arrangements for each
product, establishing a system of high effectiveness and efficiency.
In addition, the Audit Office intends to carry out more effective audits of the
performance of each division's business, and each division aims to enhance compliance
and risk management, while advancing the self-reliance of each organization.
To ensure objective control of the Company's management, outside directors and
corporate auditors are appointed as members of the Board of Directors and the
Board of Corporate Auditors, which are responsible for the supervision and auditing
of the Company. With regard to the Directors, the term of their office is limited
to one year and the amount of remuneration payable to them is determined according
to a standard that reflects their contributions to the Company. The goal is
to heighten maneuverability so as to cope with any changes in the management
environment.
For shareholders and investors, Honda's basic policy emphasizes the disclosure of financial results on a quarterly basis, as well as the timely and accurate disclosure of its management strategies. Honda will remain committed to such disclosures in the future.
|
The Company's Activities on Corporate Governance
Management organization of the Company's corporate governance for decision making, execution, supervision and others

|
1. Management Organization
The Company supervises and audits its business activities
through its Board of Directors and Board of Corporate Auditors.
The Board of Directors consists of 36 directors, including one outside director,
and makes decisions on statutory matters including the execution of important
business. The Board of Directors also supervises the execution of the Company's
business. In order to ensure proactive decision-making, the Board of Directors
set up an Assets and Loan Management Committee, which is responsible for making
decisions related to the disposal of the Company's important assets.
The Board of Corporate Auditors is composed of five Corporate Auditors, including
three outside Corporate Auditors. In accordance with the rules of auditing
policy and the apportionment of responsibilities as determined by the Board
of Corporate Auditors, each Corporate Auditor audits the directors' execution
of duties. This is accomplished through various means, including attendance
at meetings of the Board of Directors and inspections regarding the status
of Company assets and liabilities. To further strengthen the auditing structure,
one outside corporate auditor was elected at the Company's Ordinary General
Meeting of Shareholders held on June 23, 2004. The Company has five auditors
in total. In addition to this, to provide direct support to the Board of Corporate
Auditors, a Corporate Auditors' Office was established.
2. Fees for and Services Provided by the Independent Auditor
The table below sets out the fees for the independent auditor and its affiliate, both of who verify Honda's audits under the Securities Exchange Act of the U.S.A.:
| Millions of yen |
2004
|
2003
|
| Audit fees |
581
|
570
|
| Fees for audit-related businesses |
221
|
78
|
| Fees for tax audits |
484
|
391
|
| Other fees |
2
|
131
|
| Total |
1,288
|
1,170
|
|
"Audit fees" are fees for professional services of the independent auditors' audit
of the Company's financial statements, and for general services provided by the
independent auditors in relation to documents to be submitted by law or regulation.
"Fees for audit-related businesses" are fees for the independent auditors' providing
of assurance reasonably related to the implementation of audits and reviews of
financial statements and fees for other services related thereto. This covers,
for example, audits of the employee wage system, accounting consultancy, reviews
of internal controls, providing of assurance that are not required by law, regulations,
or the like, and consultations related to financial accounting reports.
"Fees for tax audits" are fees for services provided to ensure compliance with
tax legislation and regulations, tax advice, and tax planning.
"Other fees" are fees of all other services provided by the independent auditors
other than auditing services, audit-related services and tax services. This includes
education and other various support services.
Policy on and Procedures for Obtaining Board of Corporate Auditors' Prior Consent
To ensure that the independent auditor and its affiliate under the Securities
Exchange Act of the U.S.A. act in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations
and maintain complete independence from the Company, it is required to obtain
the prior consent of the Company's Board of Corporate Auditors before they carry
out the auditing services, auditing-related services, tax services and other services
for Honda.
The Company's initial policy required that each contractual agreement must have
a separate prior consent from the Board of Corporate Auditors, but in order to
make the decision-making process more efficient we are working toward streamlining
procedures by establishing categories of matters requiring comprehensive prior
consent. These categories of matters requiring comprehensive prior consent are
reviewed regularly by the Board of Corporate Auditors. Any matter that does not
fall under one of these categories still requires separate consent of the Board
of Corporate Auditors.
The Company's departments and subsidiaries that receive the auditing services,
audit-related services, tax services and other services, all report to the
Board of Corporate Auditors on the details of services received, and fees paid
for those services, during the relevant business year.
The Board of Corporate Auditors takes these reports into consideration when it reviews the categories of matters requiring comprehensive prior consent.
3. Business Execution System
The Company has established the Management Council, which
is composed of seven representative directors and three managing directors. Along
with discussing in advance the items to be resolved at meetings of the Board of
Directors, the Management Council discusses important management issues as directed
by the Board of Directors.
As for execution of business, the Company has six Regional Operations in the world
to promote its business based on its fundamental corporate philosophies with long-term
vision and rooted in the local society. Regional executive officers are assigned
to be in charge of the Business Operations in each region, with the aim of enhancing
localized business development and ensuring speedy decision-making. Each regional
executive council located at each Regional Operations discusses important management
issues in the region within the scope of the authority conferred upon them by
the Management Council.
The Company's four Business Operations motorcycles, automobiles, power
products, and spare parts formulate the medium- and long-term plans for
their business development, and each Operation aims to maximize its business performance
on a global basis. The Company's Production and Purchasing operations support
production-related departments so that they can implement the most efficient allocation
of production and procurement in the world. These efforts are aimed at increasing
company-wide efficiencies.
In April 2004, the Company established a Customer Service Operations aiming at
obtaining satisfaction of higher level of our global customers.
At the Company's major production facilities in Japan and overseas, operational
executive officers are assigned and are responsible for rapid decision-making.
In addition, the Business Management and the Business Support operations make
adjustments on a company-wide basis with the aim of ensuring the optimal allocation
of resources.
Research and development activities are conducted principally at the independent subsidiaries of the Company. Honda R&D Co., Ltd. is responsible for research and development on products, while Honda Engineering Co., Ltd. is responsible for research and development in the area of production technology. The Company actively carries out research and development with advanced technologies with the aim of creating products that are distinct and internationally competitive.
4. Internal Control
The Audit Office is an independent supervisory department
under the direct control of the president. This office audits the performance
of each department.
In addition to the "Honda Conduct Guideline" to be shared within the entire Honda
Group, the Company has also set up a systematic framework for compliance and risk
management in which each division of the Honda Group works to ensure compliance
and prevent management risks, and to verify the status on a regular basis under
the supervision by the director in charge. In addition to the appointment of a
director in charge of compliance and risk management, the Company has also established
organizations such as a "Business Ethics Committee" to deliberate matters related
to corporate ethics and compliance and a "Business Ethics Improvement Proposal
Line" to receive suggestions related to corporate ethics issues.
Companies listed on the NYSE must comply with certain standards regarding corporate
governance under Section 303A of the NYSE Listed Company Manual.
However, listed companies that are foreign private issuers, such as Honda, are
permitted to follow home country practice in lieu of certain provision of Section
303A.
The following table shows the significant differences between the corporate governance practices followed by U.S. listed companies under Section 303A of the NYSE listed Company Manual and those followed by Honda.
| Corporate Governance
Practices Followed by NYSE-listed U.S. Companies |
Corporate Governance
Practices Followed by Honda |
| A NYSE-listed U.S.
company must have a majority of directors meeting the independence requirements
under Section 303A of the NYSE Listed Company Manual. |
For large Japanese
companies, including Honda, which employ a corporate governance system based on
a board of corporate auditors (the "corporate auditor system"), Japan's company
law has no independence requirement with respect to directors. The task of overseeing
management and, together with the accounting audit firm, accounting is assigned
to the corporate auditors, who are separate from the company's management.
Large Japanese companies, including Honda, are required to have at least one "outside"
corporate auditor who must meet independence requirements under Japan's company
law. An outside corporate auditor is defined as a corporate auditor who has not
served as a director, executive officer, manager or any other employee of the
company or any of its subsidiaries for the last five years prior to the appointment.
Currently, Honda has three outside corporate auditors. Starting on the date of
the ordinary meeting of shareholders of Honda relating to the fiscal year ending
March 31, 2006, at least 50% of Honda's corporate auditors will be required to
be outside corporate auditors.
Also, starting on the same date, the independence requirements for outside corporate
auditors will be strengthened by extending the five-year period referred to above
to any time prior to the appointment.
Honda's current corporate auditor system meets this new requirements. |
| A NYSE-listed U.S.
company must have an audit committee composed entirely of independent directors,
and the audit committee must have at least three members. |
Like a majority
of Japanese companies, Honda employs the corporate auditor system as described
above. Under this system, the board of corporate auditors is a legally separate
and independent body from the board of directors.The main function of the board
of corporate auditors is similar to that of independent directors, including those
who are members of the audit committee, of a U.S. company: to monitor the performance
of the directors, and review and express opinion on the method of auditing by
the company's accounting audit firm and on such accounting audit firm's audit
reports, for the protection of the company's shareholders.
Large Japanese companies, including Honda, are required to have at least three
corporate auditors. Currently, Honda has five corporate auditors. Each corporate
auditor has a four-year term. In contrast, the term of each director of Honda
is one year.
Starting on July 31, 2005, when the requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the U.S.
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 relating to listed company audit committees become
applicable to foreign private issuers, Honda expects to rely on an exemption under
that rule which is available to foreign private issuers with boards of corporate
auditors meeting certain criteria. Honda expects to make a disclosure regarding
such reliance in its annual reports on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ending March
31, 2006 and thereafter. |
| A NYSE-listed U.S.
company must have a nominating/ corporate governance committee entirely of independent
directors. |
Honda's directors
are elected at a meeting of shareholders. Its Board of Directors does not have
the power to fill vacancies thereon.
Honda's corporate auditors are also elected at a meeting of shareholders. A proposal by Honda's Board of Directors to elect a corporate auditor must be approved by a resolution of its Board of Corporate Auditors. The Board of Corporate Auditors is empowered to adopt a resolution requesting that Honda's directors submit a proposal for election of a corporate auditor to a meeting of shareholders. The corporate auditors have the right to state their opinion concerning election of a corporate auditor at the meeting of shareholders. |
| A NYSE-listed U.S.
company must have a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors. |
Maximum total amounts
of compensation for Honda directors and corporate auditors are proposed to, and
voted on, by a meeting of shareholders. Once the proposals for such maximum total
amounts of compensation are approved at the meeting of shareholders, each of the
Board of Directors and Board of Corporate Auditors determines the compensation
amount for each member within the respective maximum total amounts. |
| A NYSE-listed U.S.
company must generally obtain shareholder approval with respect to any equity
compensation plan. |
Currently, Honda
does not adopt stock option compensation plans. When Honda adopts it, Honda must
obtain shareholder approval for stock options only if the stock options are issued
with specifically favorable conditions concerning the issuance and exercise of
the stock options. |
|
|